According to Mary Astell, who argues for the education of
women in her piece Some Reflections upon
Marriage, says that men are part of the problem. Is it that men are too proud to respect women,
or don’t give women much regard in general? She does mention that men are “too
humane, too wise to venture” (Astell, 2285-6), which might imply the latter of
the question. However, men are certainly
fond of their wisdom and superiority, and don’t want to “waste their time and
debase their good sense” (Astell, 2285), indicating a sense of pride on their
part. To prove which part of the
question is right, we’ll look at Astell’s thoughts on men in her piece, and see
if we can find the answer there.
In argument for the former half of the question, Astell
describes men and their contempt to leave women as they are, and not further
their education. The reason for this,
she says, is that “man has too much bravery, he is too just and too good to
assault a defenseless enemy, and if he did inveigh against the women it was
only do them service” (Astell, 2286).
Here, Astell claims that because men have presumptions about women being
weak, they wouldn’t dare assault or interfere in their affairs, unless they
believed it was necessary to do so for the women’s own good. Now this statement reeks of a superiority
complex on the men’s part, and reflects their pride and lack of understanding
women in general.
As for the latter, Astell makes the point that men are the
cause for creating foolish women who let their expectations get ahead of
themselves in regards to marriage, only to find it not as pleasing as they had
hoped. In marriage, women are treated
like slaves, and left in the dark, according to Astell, because men wish to not
to educate them. Ironically, they are
the perfect type to teach women, because they have “all the advantages of
nature”, but sadly “are so far from acquitting themselves as they ought, from
living according to that reason and excellent understanding they so much boast
of” (Astell, 2288). Therefore, it can be
expected that “a woman who is reckoned silly enough in herself, at least
comparatively, and whom men take care to make yet more so” (Astell, 2288) won’t
get an education because men don’t practice what they preach.
So when we compare the two sides of the same question, we
come up with two similar results. On one
hand, men are too proud to educate women, because they consider themselves
superior and feel no need to interfere in their lives. But on the other end, men simply don’t care
about women, because despite their great wisdom, they don’t practice it in real
life, and end up not giving women the education they need to be better
wives. When we look at the evidence in
the piece itself, it becomes apparent that the answer to the question above is both. Men don’t give much regard to the “soulless”
women who aren’t worth their time, and they see themselves as better than women
out of pride.
Nice post. Your final paragraph does a good job of explaining the larger issues or contradictions in arguments about women's education; it's one that we've seen, in various forms, in every text we've looked at from the Restoration and 18th century. I think it captures the cultural fears about women nicely. With a growing middle class, cheaper books--including novels--and a higher literacy rate, women had ready access to educational materials, and there's a lot of social unease about that, especially from the men. Arguing that women don't have the capacity for reason or to be educated becomes the fallback position for quite a few male writers.
ReplyDelete